REU ECO Guide

CSES, HORT, AECT, PLPA, HESC Agriculture Librarian

Necia Parker Gibson's picture
Necia Parker Gibson
Contact:
Mullins Library 220N

Email is the best way to contact me. Click the Email me button or use neciap@uark.edu

I've set my office phone to forward to my cell phone. We'll see how that works.

I'm working from home starting 3/16/2020 until further notice. Email or use the text number below. If you want me, particularly, ask for me.

Text a librarian: 479-385-0803

For students, faculty, and staff I will:
Answer your questions via email, phone or Skype or Facetime (until we are back to face to face).
Recommend databases for your topic.
Meet individually to work out your topic or discuss research strategies.

For faculty, I will:
Provide in-person library instruction tailored to your class, or tailored research guides to your class, with some lead time.

Meet with your students individually or in small groups.
Track down tricky citations. Purchase books and other materials, as funds allow.

I do consultations via email, Skype or Facetime (as well as face to face, when we can again).
Email me for an appointment
479-575-8421
Website

Purpose of this Page

This Research Guide brings together resources of interest to REU and Carver students with environmental, agricultural and biological topics.  If you are looking for a specific resource type, choose the appropriate tab to the side.  If you are unsure where to go, try one of the more specific Research Guides and subject pages, or get in touch with one of us. Email us for more assistance, or set up a consultation with the Engineering Librarian or the Agriculture Librarian

Search the Library Catalog for Books and More

Peer-reviewed/Scholarly?

Most peer-reviewed materials are articles in journals, essays in certain publications, or conference proceedings in some cases.

Peer review is the process by which articles or other works are critiqued before they are published. Authors send articles to an editor, who decides whether the work should be forwarded to reviewers for the journal. The most stringent form is anonymous or blind review, where neither the author nor the reviewers know whose work is being examined by whom. This helps reduce bias.

Reviewers are usually well-published researchers and experts. The reviewers return the articles to the editor with remarks and recommendations-- usually publish as is (rare), publish if edited or changed in specific ways, or don't publish. Editors most often go with the recommendation of the majority of the reviewers. 

The process is intended to improve the content of studies published-- more eyes on a project, and one's reputation on the line with peers, tends to improve the quality of what's submitted and published.  There are cases where it hasn't worked, and critics of the cycle, but it is the best system that has been developed to this point.

Credit to:

Parts of several pages in this guide were drawn or based on guide pages from the Biological and Agricultural Engineering Guide that Patricia Kirkwood and I originated and which she had updated when I started pulling this guide together. Thanks, Patricia!