Communication Disorders

Education Librarian

Profile Photo
Megan York
She/Her/Hers

~[128]~:
Mullins Library
MULN 419
(479) 575-4937
~[387]~

Chat with Us

Popular Vs. Scholarly Sources

Popular versus scholarly sources. Comparing information sources. The intention of a popular source is to inform and entertain a general audience. Meanwhile, the intention of a scholarly article is to present and/or report on original research. The appearance of a popular source is Usually colorful, attractive; articles often have illustrations or photographs. Meanwhile, the appearance of a scholarly source generally contains few colorful photographs, may have charts and graphs as necessary. Popular sources rarely cite sources, while scholarly sources have many sources cited. In terms of scope, a popular source has articles that are shorter, more superficial, often including generalized overviews. Meanwhile, scholarly sources have longer articles that are more in-depth and narrowly focused. A scholarly source begins with an abstract. For the peer-review process, in popular sources the articles are approved by the editor. Meanwhile, in scholarly sources the articles are approved for publication after a lengthy review. The authors of popular sources are often journalists with little or no specialist knowledge. The author for a scholarly source will have credentials as an expert that are explicitly stated. Popular sources generally have non-technical language for a broad audience, unfamiliar terms are usually defined. In scholarly sources, technical terms are used, the type of language used assumes that the audience has a highly specialized background knowledge on the topic.

The Peer Review Process

Flowchart that shows the steps of the peer review process described below.

Image created by Laura Cameron

Peer review is the process by which articles or other works are critiqued before they are published. Authors send articles to an editor, who decides whether the work should be forwarded to reviewers for the journal. The most stringent form is anonymous or blind review, where neither the author nor the reviewers know whose work is being examined by whom. This helps reduce bias.

Reviewers are usually well-published researchers and experts themselves. The articles are sent back to the editor with remarks and recommendations, usually 1) publish as is (rare), 2) publish if edited or changed in specific ways, or 3) don't publish. Editors will usually go with the recommendation of the majority of the reviewers. If revision is recommended, the reviewers' comments may be returned with the draft. Authors who have been asked for revisions normally make the recommended changes and resubmit the article to the editor.

The process is intended to improve the content of studies published-- more eyes on a project, and one's reputation on the line with peers, tends to improve the quality of what's published.  There are cases where it hasn't worked, and critics of the cycle, but it is the best system that has been developed to this point.

Understanding Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Literature

Image showing describing primary, secondary, and tertiary sources, and listing examples of each type. Information is repeated below in text.

Image created by Laura Cameron, Education Librarian

What is considered a primary source varies somewhat by discipline. In any case, think of a primary source as first-hand knowledge, eyewitness accounts,or reports about a specific topic.

  • In the arts - a piece of art, such as a painting or sculpture, a musical score, a poem, a book or chapter, or an essay--whatever is created by the artist, writer, photographer, etc.
  • In the sciences - the first report of research; it may be published as a journal article, or sometimes as a research report or conference presentation
  • In some of the social sciences - a primary source may be the first report of a piece of research, especially of empirical studies, or it may be something closer to primary sources in history, since some areas of these fields depend on direct observation, data, personal narratives or commentary, as from interviews or case studies.
  • For history - a primary source is a letter, a diary, speech, lecture, piece of legislation, document or manuscript-- an original source which forms the basis, with other sources, of secondary work, such as a study of life in eighteenth century Ireland

A secondary source is based on a primary source or other sources. It includes analysis, criticism, or other intellectual input. Secondary sources can include books, book chapters, articles, especially literature reviews, and some book reviews.

A tertiary source is commonly a resource or tool that helps people find primary or secondary sources. Tertiary sources include most bibliographies, databases and indexes, and library catalogs.